A documented timeline of a lifelong learner ~ Thank you for joining me

Author: hannedeener (Page 1 of 5)

Post 5 ~ A Personal Reflection

A boy wearing a red hoodie with black headphones on working on a laptop on a desk
Photo by Compare Fibre on Unsplash

I wanted take a moment for this post to reflect on the why of my practices for inclusive measures and the areas in which I could improve. I have some experience and am learning all the time. I am grateful for what I know and for what I have yet to learn. There will always be more to master and that makes me the most excited for my lifelong learning journey.

Who is Included?

From my experience of working with people with disabilities, I have some knowledge on several aspects that can make educational and technological pedagogy more equitable and inclusive. My connections to the D/deaf and hard of hearing communities have allowed me to learn about how my practices can be more inclusive for people with varied hearing abilities like embedding closed captioning in all videos I use or create, using sign language alongside spoken English, using a microphone for better amplification, and having an interpreter available for speeches and presentations. Additionally, encouraging sign language to be used for all students will allow the environment to be more inclusive.

With my experience in several Indigenous Education courses, and my family’s Indigenous identity, I have some experience with Indigenous values and cultural practices. However, this is another area that I will learn more about. I am looking forward to my Indigenous courses in third and fourth year of my teaching program.

Who is Still Left Out?

With the tools and techniques I do have, there are always going to be areas I have not discovered yet. For example, I have only a little bit of experience working with and learning from people with blindness or visual impairments. This means that it won’t be at the forefront, typically, of when I am designing lessons and materials.

There are more people with various abilities, disabilities, and diversities that I have yet to consider and will want to know how to improve my practice to be more inclusive and address the Universal Design for Learning principles better. I expect this will continue all the way throughout my academic and teaching journey.

What Do I Do Now?

Photo by Brett Jordan on Unsplash

Now is the time for me to continue reflecting, receiving feedback, and incorporating new knowledge into my practice. From my experience in this course, and several other before this semester, I am prepared to design lessons and materials with all learners in mind, not only to adapt the lessons, but to design with and for them. While continuing through school, I am building an informal Personal Learning Plan with the various mentors and resources I find along the way. This will help me evolve my pedagogy.

Post 4 ~ Interaction

After reading section 9.6 Interaction in the textbook Teaching in a Digital Age, I was struck by the sentence: “with good design and adequate resources, technology-based instruction can provide high levels of student interaction with the learning materials” (Bates, 2019). Why did this stop me reading and prompt a moment of reflection? Well, I thought back to my own experiences with technology-based instruction and have to say what drastic changes have taken place from the start of my online learning journey, back when the pandemic hit and classes were forced to move to online platforms out of necessity, to now where I am learning to navigate my own online learning communities while discovering how to employ engaging measures to build my students’ online learning communities. The quote above made me consider what constitutes “good design” and “adequate resources.” I wanted to find a video to answer the question of how to build a strong learning community for my students and I considered the various barriers, such as anxiety, hesitation, disabilities, discrimination, technological obstacles, and more, but I settled on educating about social justice involving equity and equality to help start the conversation of inclusive practices, not only for educators, but also for our learners.

Here is one video I found:

Students’ Response

This video starts with an example that students could fairly generally grasp as most students wear shoes and have had to try shoes on before in their life. This example helps to grasp the attention of the audience and begin building an individual connection to the information being shared, somewhat inherently because it relates to personal experiences.

While the thinking can get started here by the learner, what this video doesn’t encourage is how to remove and break down barriers and to provide equitable changes. At the age group I will be teaching, what can elementary students do to help progress the social justice movement?

That’s where the learning must continue and move more hands-on. Let’s explore some activity ideas!

Activity Suggestion

Although the video could have just as easily suggested some activities, a review at the end, or further prompting questions to continue learners’ thinking, that part could be left to the educator and learner to design cooperatively. I do highly suggest this because the impact will be much greater for the learner and educator when the students are able to provide their input on the activities and suggest how and why these activities could improve equitable practices. This also gets the students thinking deeper about the ‘how’ and ‘why’ aspects.

Some ideas to deepen the learning with activities:

  1. Collective Art Project: this would be a whole-class art project that focuses on two different stories: one where an individual is not having their needs met equitably and the other where the individual is having their needs met equitably. It would be set as a reminder for students that equity doesn’t look like everyone getting the same thing; but instead the thing that allows them to participate actively. I imagine it could be as big as a whole-school project in the form of a mural, but I may be brainstorming too big already. It could be as small as two scenes between paired students to a grouped or class project, or as large as the whole school. Many different mediums could be chosen for this activity, from collages and painted components, to using natural elements like sticks and leaves or even creating a human exhibit with unidentifiable photographs for preservation of the project. The options are limitless with a little imagination!
  2. STEM Tool Creation: this activity would allow the students to find a tool, like a pencil, chair, book, sink (if in the classroom), or anything, that they can design to be more accessible and inclusive. This is a neat project to also introduce Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) through the exploration and designing of a new tool. It would be neat to offer different materials such as rubber bands, drying or malleable clay, pipe cleaners, tape, glue, and many more. The idea is to use something to create an accessible and inclusive tool that can be further improved from the initial prototype, as sometimes schools have 3D printers and the concept can be generated into a printed tool that could benefit learners. This activity also teaches about the invention process and relates all the way back to Design Thinking.
  3. Equitable Environment Detective: this is where the students get to be detectives in their environment and ‘scope out’ or ‘detect’ the areas where equitable practices could be improved or engaged. They could have a chart with them to write down (or draw!) what they notice in their environment and provide suggestions for how and why those areas could and should be improved. This puts them in a position of power as they get to voice their ideas by providing their insights on their learning environment and will be heard by the teacher. Ideally, these ideas will be brought to the principal to discuss further how they could be integrated. I foresee this as being as the students’ environment in the classroom, to the school or school grounds, all the way to the neighbourhood or town, depending on age group and capacity! Children have wonderful ideas and are not always heard but I think this activity could be a very neat idea to really let their suggestions and voices be heard.

Please note that these activities could, and should, be adapted to the age group what is learning this lesson/topic. Some of these aspects may be too young and disengaging for an older audience while others may need to be adjusted to fit a younger audience. Use your best judgment and knowledge of your classroom/audience dynamic.

A person's hand flat on a table with an accessible decide on each of the fingers for a virtual keyboard.
Photo by Elizabeth Woolner on Unsplash
“A hand wearing a virtual keyboard device, that connects to the computer via Bluetooth and allows the user to type in a variety of locations.”

Lesson Extensions

While the video uses age-appropriate examples and language to build upon prior knowledge and understanding, using it as an introductory video to the topic of social justice will allow to further build on these theories and practices. As explored in my last blog post, this video also talks about removing the barriers as the ideal beyond providing equitable necessities. The next video may go further in-depth or could be a story exploring how increasing equitable measures could improve the lives of individuals living in inequitable circumstances, such as without access to basic life necessities like nourishing food and water, to assistive technology for communication or to engage in Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADLs: daily activities/practices to take care of one’s well-being and environment).

I would suggest this video ~What is Inequality and Social Justice by BBC~ and/or this book ~Noodlephant by Jacob Kramer~ (or the video read aloud here) to extend this lesson to the next. I would perhaps read All are Welcome Here by Alexandra Penfold (video read aloud here) to build understanding on inclusive practices. The discussion of social justice is not a ‘one and done’ exercise, but an ongoing and inclusive conversation that encompasses many perspectives and aspects of acquiring information. I argue that these conversations can begin with young learners in age-appropriate ways so we can educate the next generation of leaders and innovators.

Assignment 2 ~ Online Learning Inquiry Presentation

Photo by Biyi Adeniran on Unsplash

A project by Hanne, Anna, Mady, & Nicole

Thank you for joining us and watching our Online Learning Inquiry Presentation on MagicSchool Artificial Intelligence (AI) Generator!

MagicSchool is an education-focused AI Generator that aims to supply teaching and learning resources and to improve the efficiency of creating these resources. Our group chose this tool because none of us have ever used it before and wanted to try it out to test the efficiency and capability of it’s use.

Please watch the video below to observe our findings!

Unlisted Video on YouTube

Post 3.5 ~ Inclusive Design

During our zoom class on Monday, June 2nd, we -our instructor, Jess, and the participating class available at the time- discussed the ethical aspects of assessments and the areas where traditional assessment falls short. We considered how traditional assessments are insufficient at actually assessing many of the intelligences that individuals hold. It also does not account for cultural and regional knowledge and experiences. While this conversation was now just over a week ago, the significance of the ethical aspect has stuck with me and I’ve carried it into this week’s blog post prompt about Inclusive Design because of discovering the the through-line, that is active and passive failure to -not just consider- but employ the inclusive practices that enable equitable access for all learners and people.

Person's hands on desk pressing accessible keyboard buttons
Photo by Sigmund on Unsplash

When exploring the blog post Universal Design, I found the quote that stuck with me most was, “UDL takes a different approach: what if we removed the barrier?” (2023). To delve deeper and apply it to my own practice and understanding, I analyzed CAST UDL Guidelines and identified, among the many, three key ways I can apply the theories to my practice currently:

  1. Consideration 3.2: Highlight and explore patterns, critical features, big ideas, and relationships ~ under the cross section of Design Multiple Means of Representation and Building Knowledge, I can provide materials for my current and future students that have highlighted key elements in text and use graphic organizers to organize the information learned while reviewing the materials before, during, and after. ‘Know, Wonder, Learned’ charts (KWL Charts) are excellent ways to assess knowledge learned and prior knowledge held while noting any questions, or ‘wonders,’ they have along the way.
  2. Consideration 4.2: Optimize access to accessible materials and assistive and accessible technologies and tools ~ under the cross section of Design Multiple Means of Action & Expression and Interaction, I would correspond and organize any accessible needs be met with the help of the Inclusion Support Teacher, like utilizing assistive technology such as communication boards, charts, and/or tablets.
  3. Consideration 7.1: Optimize choice and autonomy ~ under the cross section of Design Multiple Means of Engagement and Welcoming Interests & Identities, I will ensure projects or final assignments for cultivating and showcasing knowledge learned in a unit summary or natural end to a subject has at least two choices of showing understanding of the materials. This could include any type of visual, audio, written, drawn (in some cases), created, or designed project could be considered as long as the individual can express how this would indicate their level of comprehension of the material. This is also a wonderful time for inquiry projects to further explore features of a subject.

Another aspect that I want to become more familiar with was detailed in the same blog post mentioning how, “an instructor should teach in the manner in which they plan to assess.” Although this more closely aligns with Assessment more than inclusive design, the overlapping theme is undeniable and the approaches cannot necessarily be separated: that is to say that assessment and inclusive design are intertwined as assessment must follow the same principles as UDL and universal design must have aspects that challenge traditional assessment forms to increase the success of all learners. In traditional schooling, assessment does not seem to be eradicated any time soon, so to improve the design for learners’ access we must first prepare them adequately to enter into these spaces and challenges so they feel they stand a chance.

The Progress is Multi-dimensional

Purple, green, pink, red, and blue light rays arching from a low centre point up around in a circle to top centre points
Photo by Daria Durand on Unsplash

Now this seems to go against the UDL approach of removing the barriers, but some barriers are so entrenched in the system that they will take longer to respond to pushback. While continuing the movement towards increased accessibility and universal design by breaking down these barriers, we cannot ignore that they are still standing.

In order to increase capacity for universal design, we must break down the barriers that stand to impede the access, involvement, and participation for people… but while we are advocating and demanding the necessary changes, we cannot ignore that these barriers continue to impede. Thus, we must continue to movement while preparing learners and individuals to overcome the obstacles until they are removed. We cannot stop on any single axis of the progress by advancing one aspect of the movement while disregarding the other. The progress is multi-dimensional.

What does this look like in my position? I must prepare my students to endure the barriers while continuing to break them down. This doesn’t feel or seem fair, but it ensures they are prepared to encounter the barriers while knowing that it is not the conclusion to the fight. This is how we build resilience.

Interactive Learning Resource

Group project by Anna, Mady, Nicole, Hanne, and Finlay

Welcome to our Interactive Learning Resource focusing on English Language Arts with a lesson on Poetic Devices in the unit Poetry!

Below you will find the link to our Interactive Learning Resource guide and overview and the PowerPoint slides succeeding.

*This project has been updated (as of June 24th, 2025) after receiving feedback from our peers ~shoutout to pod/group #4! Thanks to you, our Interactive Learning Resource has been improved with the suggestions your group provided*

Interactive Learning Resource ~ Google Docs Link

PowerPoint Slides

Please feel free to comment with any feedback or advice for us! 🙂

Post 5 ~ Universal Design for Learning… Online?

When I think about Universal Design for Learning, or UDL, my mind goes to accessible accommodations for every student and teaching techniques to stimulate and resonate with every learner in the classroom. CAST.org describes UDL in a similar way, saying that UDL is “a set of principles for curriculum development that give all individuals equal opportunities to learn” (2014). This certainly aligns with similarities in my understanding of the UDL framework, but CAST focuses more on the depth of what the principles can achieve in curriculum. What I haven’t previously considered is an aspect of UDL that is so common it fully slipped my mind: online learning.

This week I looked at the resources provided and found a common theme among them: Considering what true inclusive practices means in online education.

I also wanted to find the overarching principles to help guide inclusive practices in my own approaches. Here is what I found:

  • Intentional design (designing through UDL and inclusive design principles as guiding practices while designing online learning platforms and content)
  • Learner diversity (recognizing and responding to the various skills, abilities, and limitations that all learners possess, and using these considerations as opportunities to adapt online learning to meet these needs
  • Continual questioning (finding new and old spaces to redesign and modify to increase the inclusive atmosphere and offering questions about previous design choices, not with judgment, but with curiosity about the decisions made and who was in mind for these designs)

Writer Mia Carella supported the movement in her quote:

Photo pulled from Neurodivergent Girl on Facebook

Carella speaks to the belief of inclusive practices, and while it is important to hold such a belief, it can appear simplified and surface-level. I found Russell Lehmann’s post on Linkedin even more profound when he stated:

“Inclusion isn’t about being invited to sit at someone else’s table, it’s about building a new table together, where each person’s voice and presence matter equally. The act of inviting often implies a subtle power dynamic, as if someone is granting permission to belong. But true belonging isn’t something that can be granted; it’s something that should emerge naturally, from a shared understanding and mutual respect.”

Russell Lehmann, 2024

Lehmann captured perfectly the complex dynamics of true inclusion and went beyond the simple ‘invite’ to expressing the actions of inclusion. Inclusion is both the mindset, to consider the gaps and cracks through which people fall, and the real movement of progressing communities and spaces forward to be more inclusive for all learners and people.

Post 3 ~ Assessment

When I think of ‘Assessment’ my initial response is an anxious pit in my stomach because instead of thinking, “Oh! A method of displaying my understanding and to help the teacher/receiver know what to review,” I think, “I’m not going to get a high enough mark/grade to satisfy me.” I presume quite a few people feel the same way about assessments. What is concerning is that I fear I will transfer these anxieties onto my students.

While reading through Chapter 1 of Assessment Strategies for Online Learning by Dianne Conrad and Jason Openo, I was struck with the mentioned theory of CoI, which was defined as “a process of creating a deep and meaningful (collaborative-constructivist) learning experience through the development of three interdependent elements – social, cognitive and teaching presence” (2018). When exploring more about the CoI theory on the website, I found this helpful Venn diagram to portray the connection between the three interdependent elements:

The CoI website describes the three interdependent elements as follows:

Social presence is “the ability of participants to identify with the community (e.g., course of study), communicate purposefully in a trusting environment, and develop inter-personal relationships by way of projecting their individual personalities” (Garrison, 2009, p. 352).

Teaching Presence is the design, facilitation, and direction of cognitive and social processes for the purpose of realizing personally meaningful and educationally worthwhile learning outcomes (Anderson, Rourke, Garrison, & Archer, 2001).

Cognitive Presence is the extent to which learners are able to construct and confirm meaning through sustained reflection and discourse (Garrison, Anderson, & Archer, 2001).

Garrison, Anderson, & Archer (2000)

This provides great insight for how I need to consider my actions and presence as a future -and current- teacher. It suggests that I need to foster the social, teaching, and cognitive presences of my students but also reflect that in my own instruction. I expect that this will need to be more deeply addressed in developing a community within the classroom: one that fosters meaningful connections and learning experiences that invest in the students’ interests.

I have much more to explore on the website and theory and feel I have only scratched the surface. Please feel free to share your perspectives in a comment!

References:

Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education model. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2-3), 87-105.

Conrad, D., & Openo, J. (2018). Assessment strategies for online learning: Engagement and authenticity. AU Press. https://doi.org/10.15215/aupress/9781771992329.01

Free Inquiry ~ Summary of Our Journey

Our Free Inquiry project has been driven by our shared desire to find technological resources to support differentiated learning for our future students. We are all aspiring teachers and recognize the need for more support in schools and the expanding demands for modified instructional styles to fit the needs of the students. In our personal and professional experiences, we have noticed the academic world needs to adapt to the increasingly diverse student body, including recognition and resources for students with disabilities, new students in Canada, mental health challenges, and socioeconomic differences. Residual factors from COVID, such as lockdown, trauma experiences, and the mismatch between grade level and skill levels are all contributing factors to the growing epidemic of students struggling to perform at their expected grade level. 

The four technologies we researched aligned well with open and distributed learning principles. Some of the resources found were entirely new to us like, Open Educational Resource Commons (OER Commons) and Augmented and Alternative Apps such as Proloquo and TouchChat, while others were more familiar, like Khan Academy and Speech-to-Text. 

In this video, the teacher, Samantha Kirch, explains how she integrates technology into her classroom by using a Smartboard and iPads for the students. She also outlines how a similar engagement style can be utilized with whiteboards. 

So where does this project leave us? What now? Since exploring these resources, we all have a better grasp on ways to integrate differentiated instructional styles into our teaching, but the next move is to try them out with students and find the best supports and resources for differing ages, abilities, languages, and personalities. We know every student is unique and has individual needs and finding the best fit for each student will support their probability of success in their studies and in life. 

All of the technologies that we have explored throughout this free inquiry project are ones that we think would be great resources for educators looking to expand their competencies in relation to open and distributed learning. Overall, this project was an interesting and educational research opportunity that allowed us to explore resources that will benefit not only ourselves but also our future students, as was our learning goal from the beginning: To discover the best resources to support our learners through the use of differentiated technology with a focus on open and distributed learning. We hope you have also found some of the resources interesting and will get to try them for yourselves or in your future classrooms. 

Thank you for joining us (Anna Palmer, Mady Chase, Hanne Deener, Nicole Bell) on this educational inquiry journey. 

Post #5 ~ Speech-to-Text 

Young entrepreneur reading an e-mail on computer while recording voice message on smart phone during late night work in the office.
Image Published on August 25th, 2022 Licensed under Unsplashed+ Getty Images 

Intro:

Last week, we examined Khan Academy’s availability and limitations. We found that it follows the principles of open and distributed learning. This week, we decided to take a look at Speech-to-text technology. As a reminder, our learning goal is to discover the best resources to support our learners through the use of differentiated technology. So let’s delve in! 

What is Speech-to-Text?

Speech-to-text, also known as voice-to-text, is a technology that changes spoken words into written text. This technology uses Artificial Intelligence to transcribe, dictate, assist, and navigate. It can transcribe audio from recordings, interviews, lectures, etc. This technology is also used in voice-controlled navigation systems. However, we will focus on dictation to keep this topic relevant to K-8 classrooms. Dictation is the process of taking speech and turning it into written text. This could be in a document, email, search engine, etc. Students with disabilities commonly use speech-to-text technology.

Availability

Speech-to-text technologies are widely available and are becoming easier to use. For example, Windows has a built-in voice typing tool that pops up when you click the Windows key + H. Microsoft Word and Google Docs also have free built-in voice tools. This means students can write papers or assignments by speaking rather than typing. Schools support this technology and tend to include it in students’ IEPs. There are many free versions. However, some are paid programs. Paid programs are designed for people with more advanced needs and offer more accuracy and complex tools.

Limitations

Although this technology is widely accessible, it has many limitations. Accuracy issues like misrecognition of words, messing up homophones (there, their, and they’re), and no punctuation (unless specified) are common. Users also need access to technology such as a device, wifi, and a microphone, without which they are left unsupported. Due to various factors, some students don’t have this kind of technological access. There is also the concern for the environment.  The classroom may be too loud with background noise, or an individual might feel awkward or shy to speak out loud. Language and accents also play a role, as this technology sometimes can’t understand what the speaker is saying. Lastly, the paid programs can cost a lot of money, and many students can’t access them without financial aid.

Relation to Open and Distributed Learning 

Speech-to-text technology fits into the principles of open and distributed learning. Openness refers to the practice of removing barriers to education to make it accessible to everyone. Speech-to-text fits this principle as it is free, can be used on various devices, can be used on open educational resources (Google Docs, discussion forums, etc), and allows for greater equity in participation. Distributed learning is education that occurs over various times and locations, often referring to online learning. Speech-to-text fits this well as it can be used at home, in class, on the go, and on various devices. This technology also allows students to work independently at their own pace, which is ideal for asynchronous courses. Overall, this tool supports open and distributed learning.

Personal Experiences with Speech-to-Text – Mady Chase

I have extensive experience with speech-to-text. This tool is extremely helpful to me as someone with dyslexia. I have used it in professional and casual settings. I’ve used it to write papers, reflections, emails, texts, lectures, etc. Spelling is one of my biggest challenges, to the point where auto-correct and Grammarly don’t always know what I’m trying to write. However, speaking the words helps the word processor understand what I’m trying to spell. I also tend to waste time trying to spell a word, so speech-to-text speeds up the process. Although it works great and is easily accessible, I have to edit it and speak slower than normal so it picks up what I’m saying. I also need to speak the punctuation parts, which can sound funny and mess up the flow of my speech. Overall, I love this tool and its openness to those who can benefit from it.

Post #4 ~ Khan Academy

Image from Clever Library, illustrating Khan Academy

What Is It?

We chose to dive deeper into one of the open online resources. Khan Academy is a nonprofit, American based educational organization. This platform shares a range of useful content, lessons and practice exercises on a variety of schooling subjects. Students can use this website to find instructional videos and articles along with interactive practices on math, science, arts, humanities and more. This technology gives students an engaging opportunity for additional or alternative teachings on everyday class content. 

Availability

Khan Academy is widely available and free to sign up. This is a resource that is used by millions of people all around the world and is available through their online website as well as their mobile app. The Khan Academy is a resource that provides multiple language lesson translations (Spanish, French, Brazilian and Portuguese).

Limitations

Although Khan Academy is used worldwide and benefits many individuals, just like any other technology there are limitations. Khan Academy is an online source that lacks interaction and collaboration with others. Its focus is on independent study/ learning through video. The auditory/ visual teaching style can also limit a student’s engagement with the content as it’s not the best for that individual to learn. Another limitation that is embedded in Khan Academy’s practice is the strategy of memorization. Students are able to work through a course/ lessons and redo an activity until it is complete. The students ability to memorize the answers of an already completed activity cause their to be less actual content learning 

Relation to Open and Distributed Learning

The principles of open and distributed learning focus on accessibility and flexibility on diverse learning needs. Khan Academy aligns with these principles, this platform provides a free, open, educational resource that can be accessed by anyone, anywhere. This platform is designed for personalized learning experiences where students engage with the content at their own pace and place!

Experience with Khan Academy

Our experience with Khan Academy, as detailed by one member of our group, is the high regard for reliable and user-friendly access to school subject support with teachers who are excellent at explaining the concepts to learners and educators alike. I like this resource, recommend it to others, and will continue to use it.

« Older posts