A documented timeline of a lifelong learner ~ Thank you for joining me

Category: 339 Weekly Reflections

Post 4 ~ The World Online Outside of a Teacher’s Classroom

Photo by dlxmedia.hu on Unsplash

In a world where mostly everyone is on social media of some kind, what is the role and representation that teachers have to uphold? Does the mentor and ethical exemplar expectation carry on at every point of existence in the public eye? These are the questions I contemplated while reading through this week’s materials.

In the Networked Pedagogy: Teaching in Higher Ed Podcast by Bonnie Stewart, she notes how openness must be embraced while maintaining boundaries in interactions with students and how networks -virtual and physical- can shape human experiences… especially those with students.

Stewart addresses the overall existence of one’s online profile with three facets:

  • profile: what’s visible to an audience, private or public
  • practices: how you act online and the pictures or posts you share
  • presence: how you engage socially and spatially in networked spaces

During my Technology and Innovation course (EDCI 336), we learned about how our presence online can be perceived and the implications of various interpretations. For example, what does a shared image of alcoholic beverages or a lively night out imply for the audience when you hold the role of a teacher.

In EDCI 336, we also conversed about the standard to which teachers, especially elementary education teachers, are held and what kind of limitations that causes us to put on ourselves. It’s a hard personal decision when you want to post or share something but you also know that you’re representing a position of authority and often admiration. Furthermore, we frequently quickly assume that someone’s virtual presence represents how they conduct themselves in person because this is commonly true, but not always.

Below is a video I found interesting and can help understand a little bit more about the expectations and responsibilities of a teacher, even during outside hours.

Video by Teachers Need Teachers on YouTube

So where does this leave us as aspiring teachers? It’s important to walk the line of professionalism and personal practices with ease, if possible, and to have confidence in your decisions. It can also be integral to think about how you want to be perceived, not just what you want the world to see or know about you, but what an audience will assume about your character and practices with the content you share with the outside world. It is important to remember that mostly anything can be found with enough digging so considering the consequences of this can be crucial in making the decision to hit ‘post’ or not.

Post 3 ~ Artificial Intelligence at What Cost?

Photo by Igor Omilaev on Unsplash

After reviewing the reading materials for this blog prompt, I kept feeling the curious question rising of:

"what is the digital and carbon footprint of artificial intelligence use and of more powerful technology now?" 

When delving into Neil Selwyn’s 2021 article Facing up to the Dilemma of Sustainable Digital Futures, I found his exploration of the environmental impacts of digital technologies correlates to the unsustainable carbon footprint with the increase of human reliance. From manufacturing to data storage, Selwyn details how the “disposal of e-waste is another major environmental burden” and one that compiles on the existing burdens of AI usage.

He states strongly how we, as a society and individual people, cannot continue to consume digital technology at current rates due to the foreseen and unforeseen detrimental consequences. AI is so early on in the mass production and availability for general use now that we cannot determine the exact impacts it is making -and will continue to make- on the environment… but we can safely predict that it’s not feasible.

Photo by Andreea Popa on Unsplash

Another important point that Selwyn discussed in his article is the human reliance on AI and digital access now. It is inextricably not slowing down and while the technological advances are revolutionary in theory, the practices could be the eventual determining factor of our downfall. Not to give way to the concern of AI taking over, but with regard to the environmental impacts and carbon footprint, AI may take over as one of the largest mass waste producers.

My problem is how many different sources share conflicting results and opinions. I can’t decipher, as I have not conducted any studies myself, what information is reliable. Social media platforms tend to lean towards hyperbolic claims of the damage that AI use leads to while an instructor for another course at UVic requires AI usage as part of their curriculum. The information I am receiving is inconsistent and it’s hard to believe either side.

For example, in this article, Using ChatGPT is not bad for the environment by Andy Masley (2025), he argues strongly how many everyday activities like using a computer or running the vacuum cleaner use much more energy than using an AI software like ChatGPT. While reading through the article, the researcher does seem well-informed and uses many heavily-researched examples, however I do find the tone of the paper to be so assertive that I almost mistook it for satire initially. I also want to point out that the website Masley’s article is published on is a self-publishing site. This means that it may not go through a reviewing process by an external body. These kinds of things are important to note to determine the motivations and credibility behind published materials.

Alternatively, this journal article by Kate Saenjo and The Conversation US titled, A Computer Scientist Breaks Down Generative AI’s Hefty Carbon Footprint (2023) in Scientific American, tends to gravitate towards the other side of the AI use spectrum and argues that the usage of water and energy specifically is actually incredibly harmful towards the environment. Saenjo compares the creation of an AI model called BERT consumed the equivalent energy to a “round-trip transcontinental flight for one person.” Granted, this is measured for the full creation of this particular model. Saenjo goes on to present other comparisons in energy usage and determines that all of it (AI creation, maintenance, and usage) is more impactful to environmental damages than our planet can sustain.

Photo by Gwyn Hay on Unsplash

The image above is how I’m feeling about the argument. Ultimately, as an advocate for environmental protection measures, I tend to lean towards the presumption that the damages to the environment will lead to some catastrophic outcomes. At the very least, we know, as pointed out by Selwyn (2021), that the environmental impacts are unsustainable without the adoption of climate-friendly digital practices.

Post 2 ~ Open Educational Resources

While reading the paper, Openness and Praxis: Exploring the Use of Open Educational Practices in Higher Education by Catherine Cronin, I considered the ramifications of how Open Resources would affect students in post-secondary institutes and how the educators would utilize the materials. From first-hand experiences, I know how expensive textbooks and resources can be and how that impacts students’ already limited budgets. For the educators, assigning a costly resource must be made worthwhile with expected readings, but I feel an amount of skepticism when the required texts are written in part, or wholly, by the instructor at hand. It reflects a conflict of interest, as I see it, and I have heard it described it as “profi-teaching:” a blend of ‘profiting’ and ‘teaching.’

On the other hand, I can see how a teacher could advance in their own study and profession to the point of writing all components for their class, but then I wonder how much of it is in alignment with the educational expectations set out by the post-secondary institution or if it more closely favours their own agenda. Regardless, a little part of me always pauses for contemplation when learning that a required text has a direct endorsement to the instructor’s wallet.

Free Resources?!

Back to the article. While reading Cronin’s work, I was drawn in about the educational resources being freely available at hand and online with absolutely no cost to the user!

Except… are they entirely free?

I chose to explore the ‘open as free’ concept further because I was intrigued upon reading how “[in some] cases, while resources are technically free, they have an opportunity cost to the user in the form of personal data and usage data” (Hodgkinson-Williams & Gray, 2009). I know only a fraction of the impact of personal data collection and usage, but I do know that it can be taken and stored, then sold to companies to use for various reasons including tailored marketing. What this means is that data can be sold without the explicit consent from the user, which could be deemed unethical as it can raise concerns involving privacy.

The article examines the various means for Open Educational Resources (OERs). Within the article, I found this conceptual map of the OERs helpful to for the comprehension and categorization for the broad term ‘content:’

Perhaps you too will recognize some services included in the map, as I noticed Wikis, Moodle, MIT OCW (after reading this article about it), Internet Archive, Google Scholar, and Creative Commons. It appears more clear to me to view it laid out in a visual format how the categories are organized and what resources reflect their purpose on the internet.

While the term can be rather vague and defined individually by separate educators and institutions, below is a table from the same article by Hodgkinson-Williams & Gray (2009) that lays out the attributes of ‘openness’ from several perspectives:

I do suggest reading through the article to gain a better understanding for yourself. I recognize that I’ve only scratched the surface for OERs and have more to learn. If interested, please take a look at this short video below to gain a better understanding.

Video by UNESCO on YouTube

Post 1 ~ A Reflection on Jon Dron’s Perspective

Photo by Beth Jnr on Unsplash

While watching and listening to the YouTube video, I was in the shower and let the reflective thoughts from Jon Dron flow while I pondered. I usually do my best thinking in the shower, which can be hard when I don’t have a pad and paper to write down what made sense; but writing it into my waterproof phone does allow me to document my reflection.

Among many intriguing points of conversation, Dr. Dron expressed something that piqued my interest: when you increase extrinsic reward, you decrease intrinsic reward. I hadn’t considered the ramifications of extrinsic motivation and the actions of encouraging such. From my new understanding, it can actually draw the effectiveness away from feeling internal accomplishments and I know that the latter is a better determinant of long-term resilience and success, as detailed in a study conduced in the Journal of Informatics Education and Research. What I have to gain from this learning is the process of teaching -or more so encouraging the exploration of- self discipline and discovery of intrinsic motivators. But, how do I teach this is if I’m extrinsically motivated myself? Is it a fault to teach something you have yet to discover? There exist marriage counsellors who are divorced and counsellors who are still unpacking their own traumas… maybe the flawed existence and continual strive for improvement is only human. I have more to learn and explore on this topic.

Back to Jon Dron’s conversational exchange. He spoke about students’ specific experiences with distanced and alternative learning. For example, portfolios are opportunities that allow students to choose their best work to be submitted for review from the teacher. Conducting a pedagogical approach such as this allows more autonomy over students’ learning assessment and encourages growth. This, paired with formal assessments in the manner of tests helps, students assess their own levels and be responsible for their education, productivity, and effort as they are able to continually progress and reflect.

Photo by Ivan Aleksic on Unsplash

The second speaker with Dr. Dron isolates the theory that to make a big change in learning we must de-couple assessment and learning. This is hard, as I consider how deeply ingrained assessment is in institutions. I need to think about this more deeply as I haven’t heard this directly from an academic. I have felt similarly for a while, especially when studying for a big exam, but I have to keep wondering how education can progress with this while so much of it is standardized to push students through a system that has been breaking down for a long time now. If anyone would want to argue the latter sentence, I would encourage some reading on the decline of literacy rates in Canada and the skill levels that seldom correspond to the grade level. This has been my own observation and research.

There are many aspects of this conversation that I have to consider further and would appreciate having some exchanges to flush out the ideas more for my own comprehension and consideration. It appears I have a lot to learn… and to unlearn.

References:
Role of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Rewards in Motivating Employees. (2024). Journal of Informatics Education and Research. https://doi.org/10.52783/jier.v4i2.1185